MUSLIMS
ANSWER TOWARDS THE DOCTRINE OF 4.1 The Church Invented the Trinity and Incarnation 4.3 The Answer of Maulana Rahmatullah Kairanvi 4.4 The Answer of Ustaz Ahmeed Deedat 4.5 The Answer of Imam Ibn Qayyim 4.6 The Answer of Imam ar Razi 4.7 The Answer of Imam Ibn Hazm 4.8 The Answer of Imam al-Qurthubi 4.9 The Answer of Imam Ibn Taimiyyah 4.10 Christians Answer On The Unwillingness of Jesus to Use Godly Attributes 4.11 The Answer of Imam Abu Abd Rahman Robert Squires
4.12
But With God everything is possible: Matthew 19:26 (Christians Popular 4.13 The Answers of Imam Abu Abd Rahman Robert Squires 4.14 The Present Writer’s Comment 4.15 The Pope Defends the Trinity and Incarnation 4.16 Dr Muzammil Hj Siddiq Answers the Pope
|
4.8 The answer of Imam al-Qurthubi:
Imam Muhammad Ibn Ahmad al-Qurthubi (d.1273 C.E), the great scholar of Islam in his “Maqami Hamat al-Sulban wa Marati Rawqat al-Iman” has also drawn attention to the Christian concept that the divine nature of Jesus was unharmed by the Crucifixion (only the human was). He says that: “Since only God not man can save man, it is necessary that God or Jesus Divine nature should suffer in order to atone for man’s sins.”[1] The present writer’s comment on the statement of Imam al Qurthubi: “If the original sin was naturally transposed to all the children of Adam (The Doctrine of the Original Sin), then Jesus’ humanity side was also sinful in nature. He was also like all people born through the medium of women (Mary). Thus, his humanity part only could not save mankind from the burden of sin!” [1] Muhammad Abu Layla, 255.
|
|
|
