MUSLIMS
ANSWER TOWARDS THE DOCTRINE OF 4.1 The Church Invented the Trinity and Incarnation 4.3 The Answer of Maulana Rahmatullah Kairanvi 4.4 The Answer of Ustaz Ahmeed Deedat 4.5 The Answer of Imam Ibn Qayyim 4.6 The Answer of Imam ar Razi 4.7 The Answer of Imam Ibn Hazm 4.8 The Answer of Imam al-Qurthubi 4.9 The Answer of Imam Ibn Taimiyyah 4.10 Christians Answer On The Unwillingness of Jesus to Use Godly Attributes 4.11 The Answer of Imam Abu Abd Rahman Robert Squires
4.12
But With God everything is possible: Matthew 19:26 (Christians Popular 4.13 The Answers of Imam Abu Abd Rahman Robert Squires 4.14 The Present Writer’s Comment 4.15 The Pope Defends the Trinity and Incarnation |
4.7 The answer of Imam Ibn Hazm:
Imam Abu Muhammad Ibn Hazm (994–1064 C.E), who was among the leading Muslim theologians of all times in “al Fisol Fi al Milal wa Al-Ahwa wa Al-Nihal” rejects the Trinity and the Doctrine of Incarnation. Christians say that the essence of the divinity and humanity were united together, and this unity did not cancel the essence of the other (refer to The Chalcedon Creed). Christ is both, the Lord God and the son of Mary who remained in the womb and was given birth by her and who was crucified. In Ibn Hazm’s opinion, the Christians are thus guilty of falsehood when they try to separate the two natures, and make only one of them suffer on the cross or subject to the human affections.[1] He states that: “Christians cannot appeal to the theory that only the human nature of Jesus (al-Nasut) met with pain of mind and body and with actual death, etc and not (the Divine one –al-Lahut) because they believe in the unity of the two natures; -the Doctrine of Incarnation) and Jesus in their opinion is God, whom they worship, and this being so, the two natures of Jesus cannot be separated. Thus, based on the doctrines; God died crucified because the divinity of God also suffered, not only his humanity.”[2] [1] Christian’s claims that after being united the Humanity and the Divinity became two separate essences, one human and the other divine. The Crucifixion and death of Jesus are related to his human aspect and not to his divine person. Similarly his birth is related to his former person. They say that Christ as a whole is worthy of worship and Lord God. (Izharul Haq, Part 3, 248-249) [2] Muhammad Abu Layla, 320, 291(adapted in part)
|
|
|
